RSS

Category Archives: psychology

Neurodivergence and Spirituality

By the time I finished 8th grade, I had read the complete works of Alan Watts and listened to every one of his recorded lectures. I had also read the entire catalogue of Carl Jung and worked my way through the complete mythology collection of my library. This is not the way to make friends. But it is a great way to see the world differently than nearly everyone around you. Especially in middle school.

But the truth is I had seen the world differently well before reading those books. My literary selections were an outgrowth of how I already interacted with the world. Recent studies (2020) at Emory University reported, and this has been replicated many times since, people with a well “organised” prefrontal cortex tend to be religious, monotheistic or conventionally religious as defined by their culture and are more likely to belong to common, “normal,” organised religions while people with a “disorganised” prefrontal cortex are more likely to be spiritual, pantheistic, animistic, and do not define themselves as religious in the common sense. Notice, here, the loaded language please. Organised vs disorganised. Organised equals good. Disorganised equals bad. America, the home of toxic independence and the pernicious myth of the rugged individual, sees the organised as good. A god, humankind, animals, plants, air, water, and rocks, all separate, each in their place, in a hierarchy. Disorganised?…  well, who knows how THOSE people see the world. Everything connected? An interdependent web? Obviously disorganised.

But what if we change the terms? Describe the prefrontal cortex construction as rigid or diffuse? Like the terms neurotypical and neurodivergent. Typical vs divergent. Normal vs abnormal. More loaded language. Autistic folk, as an example, tend to have a more diffusely organised prefrontal cortex with greater connectivity than the rigid, less connected cortex of the neurotypical person. Perhaps that sounds a bit mean. If so, that wasn’t on purpose but demonstrates one of the effects of purposefully chosen loaded language. It also illustrates the inherent bias of the authors of the studies in this area. But rhetorical linguistics aside, the facts remain. Autistic people have greater, wider connectivity in a prefrontal cortex that is organised differently than that of the average person who has, shall we say, more orderly connections. And this is not uncommon in people who are, what this culture has come to call, neurodivergent. As the focal length of an eye changes how we perceive light, the shape of the brain changes how we perceive life. We see the world in a different way because we are built in a different way. 

Greater connectivity in the brain tends to lead to, not ironically, seeing more things in the world as connected. Less division. While neurodivergent people may have very particular ways of doing things, and often seem hyperorganised, this is generally because they sense the connection between that organisation and the ripples it sends out into the world. Seeing more things as connected, seeing fewer divisions, seeing things as a system, very much affects our spiritual life. 

In Buddhism, for example, there appears to be a preponderance of Autistic folk. In North America, 40% of all people who come to Buddhism from other religions are Jewish. 40%. 2% of the North American population make up 40% of the Buddhists. BuJus. Jews are much more likely to be autistic as well. As a matter of fact, one of the gene mutations that appears to play a large role in autism is seen much more frequently in Ashkenazi Jews (1:80) as compared to the rest of the population (1:20,000). There is a clear correlation here. In fact, there are many who postulate that Gautama Siddhartha was, indeed, autistic. The case is made most clearly by Dr. David Goren in his book Symphony for India, Buddha, and Freedom. Dr. Goren, as well, refers to himself as a BuJu.

Why Buddhism? Buddhists may practice together but, even together, it is still an individual practice. It is spiritual parallel play. It emphasises the connected nature of the world and a diffuse self with a decreased emphasis on the self over that of the society and nature. Buddhism is broad in scope yet has simple rules that make sense. Especially as it came to America with the Zen of Suzuki Roshi and the Tibetan derived Shambhala of Trungpa Rinpoche with their much greater emphasis on environmental and social justice in what came to be known as 4th Wave or Engaged Buddhism. 

In Paganism, neopaganism, and witchcraft, we find many people who are neurodivergent. There are no numbers, no percentages, but anyone who has been involved in Earth Centered religions certainly knows this is so. Again, Earth Centered religions emphasise the connected nature of the world and everything in it. From Witchcraft to animism, you will find neurodivergent people. You will find far more neurodivergent people in a pagan group or coven than in any Baptist church.

The reasons for this are manifold. Not only is there more emphasis on interconnection in the nature of these practices, but they stress both cooperation and shared effort as well as the validity of the individual spiritual experience. There is a long history of seeing people who are neurodivergent as not fitting in. That makes for great difficulties in many churches, in many religions. They are frequently shunned, and often they remove themselves from the confines of those painful religious strictures and find other ways to express their “eccentric,” nonconforming spirituality. In days long past, neurodivergent people were often seen as changelings, or touched by the gods, and were shunned or exalted, but certainly didn’t fit into the dominant forms of the extant religion. So too, today.

Neurodivergent people are often pushed to find their spiritual home elsewhere for other reasons as well. In the general population, approximately 5% of people identify as LGBTQ, but approximately 30% of neurodivergent people do. The percentage is even high for the 1.5% of the population that is autistic, specifically. A neurodivergent person is six times more likely to be queer. For gender fluidity, the percentage difference is even higher, at eight times the general population. One can easily see why many neurodivergent people would not find a home in the religion in which they were brought up and look elsewhere for an accepting, fulfilling spiritual home. 

In 2022 and 2023, The UUA, The Unitarian Universalist Association, ran a series of classes specifically for clergy and congregational leaders on this very topic. A series of seven classes with the overall title, “Embracing Neurodiversity: Pathways to Understanding.” The Unitarian Universalist Sources (Sources of Our Living Tradition –  the six sources from which UUs draw their traditions and must be affirmed by the congregations) create an atmosphere that tends to draw people who are neurodivergent. The UU emphasises acceptance of the individual but fosters cooperation. They celebrate critical thinking, Humanism, acceptance of Earth-based spirituality, the individual vision, the personal journey shared with others, and the affirmation of the personal prophetic, spiritual experience,  and this calls to many neurodivergent people. The seven UU Principles should make this a happy home for neurodivergent folk, but nothing is perfect and that is not always the case, lest the UUA would not be creating classes on this very topic. But the understanding there is much to learn about, and much to learn from, their neurodiverse members is a great place to start.

Neurodivergent people feel very deeply. Many may find difficulty in expression, or have a more amorphous sense of emotion, or have trouble in specifically identifying a feeling, but feel deeply nonetheless. Likewise, a difficulty with interoception, the perception of the internal world, of how the body is feeling, may often lead to indistinct feelings, and a blur between the mental, emotional and physical worlds. “Where does it hurt” may be a difficult question. Feelings can be somaticised, expressed in the body, and then difficult to describe and locate. Anger may be felt, but not noticed. It may express itself as stomach pain. But ask where it hurts, and you may get a very general answer. Doctors don’t like that. From personal experience, I know.

Even the general sense of self can feel undifferentiated. And that may be the key. A sense of self, emotionally, mentally, physically, that is experienced in an undifferentiated way leads to experiencing the world in an undifferentiated way. A diffuse self leads to experiencing the cosmos, spirit, in a diffuse way. It can lead to experiencing the universe and spirit in a way that is fluid, nonconfining, open and dynamic without solid, defined boundaries.

It can lead many to feeling awe in most all things. Drop me anywhere, any place, and I am a kid in a candystore, but that candystore is the world around me. Like Thoreau, I can spend three pages writing about a small melting rivulet in a bank of snow as though it were the most fascinating thing I have ever come across. Because, at that time, it is. I spent more than an hour once transfixed by a lone aspen leaf oscillating in the breeze while all the other leaves were still, seemingly frozen in space. Any place I go, fascination, connection, and awe. Any place I go, spirit, wonder, and beauty. 

But the brain that allows us to experience the world in that way can also lead us into confusion. The poet Chris Martin put it like this: “Imagine your brain is a nest of highly charged wires, many of them overlapping in ways that bring you startling and multidimensional impressions of the world. Then imagine these same wires threaten at all times to overwhelm your ability to engage with that world. Imagine your sensory acuity is so intense that its five inputs habitually merge and surge.”

Merge and surge. One result of that merging is synesthesia. Synesthesia is the melding of at least two of our senses. It is what happens when the often mostly distinct areas of the sensory cortex, that wrinkly outer layer of the cerebral cortex that processes and makes sense out of information gathered by our five senses, overlap each other. It is how we can taste yellow and hear blue. It is how names have scents and one can feel sound. It is music flowing through space as vision and the taste of trees in the distance.

It was once thought that synesthesia was exceedingly rare. One in 10,000, maybe. But now we know it isn’t quite that rare. It is even built into our language. Cheese really isn’t sharp, afterall, but we describe it that way. The name Kiki sounds sharp too, but Obubo sounds round and soft. If I drew two figures, one round and one spikey, and let people choose between the two names, 80% would choose the soft name for the round figure and the hard sharp name for the spikey one. Now, imagine a world that is like that in so many other ways, all the time. That is the experience of so many neurodivergent people. 

Studies have shown the prevalence of synesthesia is almost three times higher in people with ASD (20%) compared to that of the general population (7%), and much more wide ranging and intense. No wonder so many neurodivergent people experience a world with fewer boundaries and divisions, and, sometimes, confusion. No wonder the lines between self and spirit become blurred. No wonder we see the world in a different way. 

David Derbyshire, psychologist, sums it up like this: “as neurodiverse individuals, we can find we have deep spiritual experiences as well as this empathy with others, though many may have trouble expressing it. Our sensitivities may mean that we are more comfortable spending time on our own in contemplation, thinking about spiritual issues. For some of us this may lead to experiences that some would call mystical. This might include a deep sense of oneness with the universe, or other unusual feelings and impressions including specific mental images or visions.”

I learned a word when I was very young. Kensho. In Zen Buddhism it means seeing or perceiving. It is a sudden realisation, a fleeting moment of enlightenment, when one feels a part of everything. When one realises, and feels, the interconnectedness of all things, boundaries disappear, and the ego dissipates. The I is absorbed into the universe of all that is. Try explaining that to your parents. Try explaining to them that the whole world is subfused in a golden glow.

Paul Bataille’s, the Zen teacher, in “Kenshō, Now What?,” asks, after the flash, what then?  “Life goes on as usual – shopping lists, laundry, the smell of onions frying. But something invisible doesn’t quite return to its old shape.”It’s as if the outline of “me” has become transparent, the lines faintly smudged. Just the taste that cannot be described still lingering forever on the tongue.

What does it do to a young person to experience that, without the ability to describe it or anyone to understand it? This may be why your neurodivergent friend doesn’t talk about these experiences. This is why so many of us remain apart. This is why so many of us remain silent.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 10, 2026 in psychology, Religion, Social

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Food Comes To No Good

I want to be
Diaphanous. So thin
You don’t know I’m here.
Wraithlike, drawn like the
Wire, sounding only when
Plucked, brushed,
No voice of my own.

Wispy, vaporous.
Watery.

This business of
Food in the mouth
Comes to no good.
Disgusting (I tell myself)
But there I go again.

Walk a little more.
Lift a little more.
Did you eat that?
Why? Do something
About it. Get rid of it.
You don’t want that
In you.

But you will do it
Again. And again
You will feel
The shame of consumption,
Existence. The physical needs
That keep you.

From being
Insubstantial.

The constant failure
To not be
As I am supposed to be.
As I am told to be
Thin.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on June 28, 2024 in Culture, Food, Poetry, psychology

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Four Names

I have four names. Not nicknames. I’ve never had a nickname. Yes, once a a friend of a friend insisted on calling me Ad, because, one must assume, adding the phonological onset of “um” was too much for her to add to “Ad.”  I refused to answer until the behaviour extinguished itself. A department head called me “Little Adam,” until I asked her not to. Her calling me this made little sense, apart from my height, because there was no other Adam and, hence, no need to distinguish me from a wholly hypothetical “Big Adam.” In grade school I wanted to be called Grasshopper. Despite my best efforts, this never caught on. Despite my best efforts, I also never learned kung fu. My sensei told me I roll like a sheet of plywood. 

Adam Ant did catch on, but I never saw a reason to answer to it.

My mother named me Adam Byrn Tritt. My mother told me Byrn meant bear in Welsh. It does not. Nor do I know why she’d want my middle name to mean bear. While Welsh makes sense, as it is where her father’s side of the family escaped to when expelled from Portugal, Byrn doesn’t mean anything in Welsh. Byrne, however,  with the added e, means “from the brook.” That isn’t helpful.  Byrn does mean raven, however, in Gaelic. As far as I know, this was not her intent, but my entire life I have had an affinity for that bird, the symbolism behind ravens, which crosses cultures, and have, in many ways, lived up quite well to what the raven symbolises. It comes from Bran, an Irish god, the chief god, the giant god, whose symbol is the raven. Some of my favourite art is that of the Northwest Tribes in their depictions of Raven, and some of my favourite stories are those of the creative, the trickster, Raven. The Raven is often misbehaving but never boring, and through his actions he brings necessary changes to the community. This, I feel, was not my mother’s intent.

Also not her intent was to have it misspelled. She sent an aunt, Aunt Anne, to go and give the information for my birth certificate. Confused, she spelled my middle name “Bern,” as though my mother had named me after a city in Switzerland, and that is how it is still on my ID, Social Security Card, Passport, and all government documents. Thank you, Auntie Anne.

My mother never called me Adam though. On occasion she called me her melonhead. But most of the time she called me Adamus.  Adam comes from the Hebrew “adamah,” for earth or soil, and came to mean man, thus Adam and Eve, from the Hebrew for “life.” Thus, Adam and Eve are Earth and Life. But, she told me, she didn’t name me after the Hebrew, but from the Greek, “adamantinos,” originally, and then through the Latin “adamantinus,” for unbreakable, unyielding. Adamus, she said, was my real name. 

I have used that so very much in my life, taking the meaning of it to heart, making that part of me. What’s in a name? A lot, at least for me. At least, for that mine.

Lee would tell me “no one tries harder,” which is something I tell myself whenever there are difficulties. Lisa calls me “Tenacious A.B.T.” which I absolutely love, and have taken as much to heart. Lisa’s own take on Adamus and it could not make me happier.

Adamus, however, is something no one calls me anymore. Except myself. It is how I think of myself still. My mother, of course, called me that. Lee called me that. Joyce called me that out of the blue, one day, and forever after, without having ever having heard it. For them, here is one “of blessed memory.” Of blessed memory, all.

Then there is my Hebrew name. Avraham ben Fishel. Abraham, son of Fishel. A, after my grandfather, Albert. Albert Cohen. Avraham ben Fishel. Father of Nations, son of Fish. Why do we Jews have separate Hebrew names? It comes from being in diaspora in volatile regions with fluid borders. One day, you’re in Poland, the next day the border moves and you are now Belorissian. Last names change to fit the circumstance, the language, the politics, but the Hebrew name stayed the same. Like a magical name, it is used in the temple for ceremonies. Given when born, used when you die. Father of Nations, son of Fish.

Then there is my Buddhist name, given to me by the *Rinpoche when I took refuge. This was 1996, Gainesville, Florida. 

Prior to taking refuge, a woman in the small group of us, about twenty in total including Rinpoche and his translator, Lama Losang, asked me if a person could hug a lama. I said yes, but be careful, because they can spit up to eight feet. She looked confused, which was not helped at all by the translator, also a monk, spitting up the water he was drinking. A gentleman I knew was shaking his head and saying my name under his breath as he did so. 

When it was my turn, “do you take refuge in the Buddha, the Dharma and the Sangha?” I replied yes. Well, honestly, I asked a question first. I said, “Before I say yes, understanding this means I come back again and again in order to help relieve the suffering of all sentient beings, I’d like to know: do I get any vacation lives?” The translator smiled. He asked. Rinpoche spoke, the translator spoke: “Rinpoche says he is sure you will find ways to have time off and fun in the process of helping others.” That was good enough for me. Rinpoche handed me a book with my name on the back. My fourth name. Karma Bondru Zangpo. Excellent Diligence, Rinpoche said in Tibetan. Excellent Diligence, Lama Losang said to me. Rinpoche said something else, and Lama Losang repeated in English, Rinpoche says this name is your greatest strength, what often defines you, and your greatest struggle and that which can destroy you. And he asks you to notice this, and find the middle way, that you may live long, and be happy in your life.

And so that is my name. My fourth. When I think of myself I think of Byrn, the raven, Adamus, and Karma Bondru Zangpo. I think of the creative truth-teller trickster, adamantine, and diligence. Of making good trouble. Of being unyielding by nature but needing to learn when to yield. Of being indomitable, but having to learn when to bend, when to step back. When to stop. Those are the lessons of my life. They are what makes me and breaks me. When I think of who I am, those are the things of which I think. 

What I never think about is fish.

* Through Karma Triyana Dharmachakra, of The Karma Kagya lineage, with its North American seat in Woodstock, NY.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 26, 2023 in Family, philosophy, psychology, Religion

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Today is my Anniversary

Today is my anniversary. The clock moves on, pages pulled from calendars, life moves on, people move on. But dates remain, along with the people for whom they mean something. This date means something to me. But not to anyone else. Not anymore.

And so the day goes on. Lisa is at a funeral. I am at work. I’d be at the funeral too, but today is the last day of mid-term exams, and the last day before the winter break. Taking off today was simply not going to happen. People move on.

Bob was a friend. A radical in the style, location and times of the Chicago Seven, a musician, a photographer, and political activist, Passover and Hanukkah at our house, jam sessions – his funeral is today. Cancer. Everyone seems to die of cancer. Ryan wondered what to do with his anniversary with Joyce, after she died. He didn’t have to wonder long. He died a week ago just about two years after she did. Cancer. He is no longer worried about his anniversary, how it will feel when it comes around, how it feels when it’s here, whether to mention it, not mention it, toast it, ignore it. Bob was older. Early 70s. Ryan was in his 40s.

And I’m in my 50s now. Late 50s. I was in my mid 40s then, when I first wondered what to do with this date. Lots of people have died since then. But not me. So I’m still wondering. Like my father wondered. His father, too. Now, no more wondering.

And wondering how much longer I will feel this way. How much longer will this date still have this charge? If the answer is for the rest of my life, how much longer will I still wonder what to do with it?

I’m not looking to leave anytime soon, but I do want to know what to do. How to notice it, and give its proper due without tripping over it, without ignoring it, which I could not do. Would not do. Would not want to do. Could not forgive myself if I did. 

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 21, 2021 in Family, psychology, Social

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

What’s In A Name?

What’s in a name? For a rose, very little. Roses don’t care. But people. People care, and why would they not? Identity, history, connection, and potential futures can come and go with a mis-identification, mis-recognition,or mis-spoken name. Names have power. Names have weight.

But old patterns die hard. They weigh more. Life changes, but old patterns don’t. The brain changes but the patterns are still recognised. Still followed. They are the watercourse.

Know a girl since you are fifteen, marry, have children, grow older, support each other, change with each other, be happy, develop patterns of speech, strings of words, ways of communicating, watch her die. Old patterns – they don’t die. 

Life is relentless. Keep promises. Be happy. Grow. Change. Love again. Love well. Love fully and completely. Be happy together. And, always, yet, the danger of the old pattern. The name. The slight halt before the saying. The self-check. The nearly unconscious pattern of words as it nearly slips out. Nearly, corrected. Not always. Not even often. But sometimes. And sometimes, even seldom, is enough to give wary pause always.

Don’t make the mistake, though, sometimes the name is half-out before you catch it. Don’t make the mistake, though sometimes you know you must have.  Hope you have not, but know you have. No one deserves that. 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 21, 2021 in Culture, Family, psychology

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Dwarf or Troll

I have been mean to myself over the last two weeks. Even more than usual, and that is saying something. Extraordinarily mean. Exceedingly, aggressively mean. So hostile I have stopped myself in surprise. So rude I have wondered how I could treat anyone that way, let alone myself. And, yet, I have. I do. I am.

This is not mere description, not evaluation, but judgement. All judgement. I have vacillated in my belief of free-will, and yet somehow feel that my willpower is fully under my control. And many of you will agree it is, as does part of me. A small part. The part that looks on, aghast. Not the part that derides, castigats and punishes. 

I was listening to music today, as many days. I put on a song by The Carpenters, “Bless the Beasts and the Children,” and listened, and, as often I have when listening to Karen Carpenter sing, cried a bit. How she could hate herself, her own body, so much that she would starve herself to death? Starve and die. How could she? Yet, I’d do the same, if only I had the willpower.   

Willpower. It is stronger than I think, and I am usually right on. I get to the gym regularly, eat “right” for me, and do what I need to do. Yet, any small meandering off that straight path feels a failure, a disaster, and a breach of that which is sacred – a mistake for which I will surely be punished. And if the Gods do not, I will find a way to do so myself. 

For letting myself down, and, worse, letting my family, my loved ones, all, down, for the constant disappointment I must be, there is only punishment and suffering. For being of no value. And no way to redeem myself but to make things easier for everyone and leave. At best, to fall asleep and not wake again. At best. 

Value. Value depends on how well I adhere to the protocol. And lack of orthodoxy, which is common, means a diminution of personal worth. A decrease of value as a human being. And a reduction of usefulness. Being useful means being of no value. Mind you, this refers to me only. This is never a standard I would think of applying to anyone else. For others, simply being is all that is required for worth. The idea of worth is silly. They are. They are loved. They love. What more could one want?

This entire last week I have been preoccupied with a question. Do I look more like a troll or a dwarf? Dwarf only occurred to me as a sort of partial redemption, since they are at least industrious. I have even been looking to see if dwarves write, since I am not a smith or builder. I was working to justify my place as a dwarf. 

I have thought often I had come to accept myself as an endomorph. That acceptance is always short-lived. I see others who are short, thick, stout, able, and I think that is fine. Really, I don’t think much at all of it unless it comes up. But, examining my thoughts – low center of gravity, tough and dense, strong. This is a fine fine way to be. But that’s not what I see when I look at myself. Troll. Others, strength and power, softness and ability. Myself, troll. 

And that is something I feel I should apologise for. I’m always feeling like I have done something, many things, wrong, always something wrong, and always feeling I should apologise and mostly never sure what for, except for just being me. For inflicting, on them, myself. I want to take each family member aside and thank them and apologise. Each friend. Anyone who has to deal with me. Any coworker I can’t look in the eye. I can’t believe anyone would want me around. My lack of understanding I feel I consistently exhibit, miscommunications, look, twitching, habits… everything. It must be very difficult being my friend. I’m not sure why anyone would be. They deserve better. I’m sorry. 

And all these things, and the emotions, I feel I should be able to control. And, regardless of effort, at that I have failed as well.

One friend, now dead, once told me I must have a very low opinion of her to think she’d be friends with me if I was what I think I am. So, as I had a high opinion of her, quite high, I must be pretty special. And that must prove I am not as I see myself. Logic. I have a very high opinion of my friends and can’t believe my fortune. Sometimes I wonder what I must have done right, but mostly, I just wonder. And so I keep trying.

I do the best I can. That I can say with neither reserve nor doubt. I always have, no matter how much I have screwed up, and I have done so monumentally. Always. The effort there, always. The best I could with what I knew and the tools I had. When I was in school, I went to guidance and asked for help. In my twenties, thirties, forties, I went to psychologists for help. Never any real assistance. No tools. No skills. Not for the frustration. Not for the confusion. Not for the communication. Forget the lack of social skills. Just help me get through a day without wanting to punch myself in the head. Without actuallybanging my dead against a wall. That would be nice. Finally, with a chance remark by a clerk in a psychology practice, a clerk who thought I was in the wrong place and that I was supposed to be downstairs in the Center for Autism Treatment, with some pushing with her to explain what she meant, and discussion with the psychologist where I nearly demanded the battery of tests, and diagnosis of ASD in the severe range. Finally. And finally skills. Finally tools. Finally the ability to modulate my reactions, to choose responses. But the feelings are still there. And no amount of Rational Emotive Behavioural Therapy is going to change those. And so here I am. Still working on being better, doing better, and still looking up any information I can to prove that I’m a dwarf, at least, and not a troll.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 29, 2021 in psychology, Social, Suicide

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Food

Food is a pain in the ass. I understand it isn’t supposed to be, but it is. And I understand how ungrateful I sound saying so. Food is necessary, I know, but I like to think it isn’t. That it doesn’t need to be.

I think I hate food, actually. I’d say I hate food except when I’m eating it, but that isn’t true. I hate food even when I’m eating it. I hate food even when I’m enjoying it. I know that enjoyment is thoroughly transitory and, unless my food it is perfectly chosen and portioned, it will be followed by regret, guilt, rapprochement, and replays of all choices I could have made better, with each imperfect choice a failure of my character.

I’d happily eat a “chow” instead, or food pills, and be done with it. The chow could come in cans, like dog food. Not that horrendous stuff but something like Merrick’s. Merricks has flavours like Granny’s Pot Pie, Cowboy Cookout, Brats and Tots. We used to feed Dusty Merrick’s and, once, when my son opened a can for her, he looked at his mother and asked, “Why don’t you ever cook anything this good.” She had no answer. Mostly because he was right. And there was everything Dusty needed there, made with the best of ingredients, in just two cans a day. Why can’t I have that? Why can’t I have that simplicity and security?

I’ve tried shakes and such but the results are less than positive after a few days. Troublesome. Uncomfortable. I’ve gone as much as a week, and didn’t get out much, other than to work, after day three. I’ve also tried simply not eating. Eight days is as far as I ever got. Just didn’t want to eat. Eight days and I finally relented. People began to notice. Not in my face or clothes, but just noted they hadn’t ever seen me eat or refer to any meals. This is what happens when people love you. They notice things. Sometimes I think that is a good reason to be alone.

I had actually planned on going much longer, and in my head didn’t think anyone would notice at all. That I could go a month and no one would notice. That was my plan. A month. Longer.

Planning, choosing. Worrying. Food is never simple. So much of it is obviously crap, and I don’t want to eat that. And there are so many diets to choose from. Even when one dismisses the idea of a diet as specifically for weight-loss, the number of ideas of how a person should eat are staggering and contradictory. How to choose? They all can’t be right.

Michael Pollan says we worry about diets far too much. “Eat (real) food. Not too much. Mostly vegetables.”And “If it came from a plant, eat it. If it is made in a plant, don’t.”  Those are his rules. They should be easy to follow, but planning any meal shows they are not. This is why I tend to just eat the same thing again and again, even though I am a more than adequate and inventive cook who can plan rather nice meals for friends and family when occasions calls for them. For other people, yes. For myself, I’m happy to do the same thing for each meal, without getting bored, just for the sake of simplicity and to remove the tyranny of choice.

Mornings, if I can just put stuff in a blender and know it’s good for me, I honestly don’t care what it tastes like. Greens, protein/eggs, a nut milk (no dairy unless I want to spend the day with a headache and stuffed sinuses). Done. I can add cocoa powder and stevia. That’s fine. But I don’t have to. No having to make choices, plan, choose, “what do I feel like,” etc…

My mother worked her whole life to lose weight. We are a thick people. Cabbage diets. Liquid protein. Carb free. As long as I can remember, she was dieting. I can’t recall it ever working. She finally lost her extra weight, twelve years into her fifteen years with parkinson’s. She was an exquisitely thin corpse.

I went carb-free, or nearly so, at twelve or thirteen. No more than forty grams of carbohydrates a day. I counted. I don’t remember how much I weighed or how much I lost, but I recall I thought I was still horribly fat. My clothes could not be tight. Nothing could cling. It had to be loose or I would pull at it, stretch it, tug it away, misshape it. I could not stand the feel of it and always blamed it not on the clothes being too small, not on skin sensitivity, but on one thing – I’m, obviously, too fat.

I was 140 pounds. When I see pictures of myself then, I’m astonished how thin I was. What was I complaining about? What could I not have liked about my body? But, then, the answer to that question was “everything.” There was everything not to like, and nothing to appreciate.

Even then, I could not look in a mirror. I pass mirrors and close my eyes. My wife once noticed, when I shave, I lean into the mirror, but close my eyes. Nothing to see here.

Once, a few years ago, a decade, less, I passed a mirror and saw someone I didn’t recognise and thought, since it was a small office, and my office at that, “Nice/Who is that?/Cute” all at once. I remember this so well, and the pile of thought, because within that same moment I realised it was me, and I saw the image shifted into one I could not stand. I could not recapture that moment, that feeling. I can remember it, but can’t feel it. And delusion does not succumb to logic.

In the mid 2000’s, I was in Weight Watchers. I had to lie to get into it. They asked me if I binged or starved. I lied. I binged and purged. Since I was a teen. Certain foods were hooks. Peanut butter. A jar would not last. A bag of potato chips would not make the night unless I froze it. Then it might make a few nights. A tray or box of fried chicken? Gone. Sometimes I’d buy a tub of frosting and eat the whole thing while watching TV. That would make me tremendously sick. I’d tell myself I’d never do it again. Why would I? Then I’d convince myself, a month later, or on a special occasion, that it was ok. I’d rationalise it. I could rationalise anything. That was especially true if it was at night. Nights are dangerous. Every purchase a personal failure.

The best way to handle this was to simply not buy these things. They didn’t come into the house. I finally did manage to learn to do that. But I might get a cookie. Or a roll. Then I’d punish myself by having to run a mile for that cookie. Eat a cookie? Now you need to run. When I couldn’t do that, laxatives. Then, realising that was easier, I’d take laxatives anytime I considered what I did binging – a piece of cake or slice of pie, too much at a potluck. My definition of binging is very liberal.

I hate food-centered events and try to not participate. At work, I stay in my room anytime there will be food involved. I “feel” people are watching what I’m eating, judging. It’s easier to just stay away. Required to attend? I go early, race to get there first, so i can choose an empty table, sit far away, as long as i can sit alone. “There are donuts in the teacher workroom.” That day, I don’t even check my mailbox.

With Weight Watchers, I lost weight. I never got to goal weight though. I did get down to 152. Their charts said I should be 118 to 128. My wife said that would be a ridiculous weight for me – far too thin for my body-type. She, being a doctor, could certify, and did, that my goal was 142. It might as well have been 118, as it was just as unreachable. Food log, pedometer, a scale for me and one for the food, measuring cups, a well-used gym membership. 152. I must have recognised I had done well. I even wrote about the hard work of losing weight, and the success of it. But I still hated seeing myself. The failure of it. Now I look at that and wonder, what was I complaining about? But that’s gone too.

When she died, my weight was 202. A few months later, after I began to look at the world again, I got a membership at a gym that was open 24 hours. I was there when I couldn’t sleep. I was there when I was bored. I was there when I could not stand being in the house, or going home, or going to bed. So I was there nearly as much as I was home. I was there at ten at night. I was there at four in the morning. I was there twice a day sometimes. Work, gym. Work, gym. Presidential debate? Watch it on the treadmill. Show I want to see? Watch it on the treadmill. Lift weights, lift some more. I tore my right deltoid. Keep going. Eating nothing but chicken breasts and vegetables. Keep going.

I got down to 158. I thought it was terrible. When I see those pictures now… What was I thinking? I couldn’t have been thinking. It isn’t possible.

I’m back at the gym. Walking with my fitness watch. Biking. Watching what I eat. Eating. How I wish I could stop that. I gained weight last week. Despite everything. Still gaining. An obvious failure of my character.

I’m told “do this.” Do this, Do that. Try this other thing. Thyroid. Took stuff. No effect. Testosterone. Sorry, in the normal range, even though it’s at the bottom of it (like we are machine that run to the same tolerances and configurations) so none for you. Try this, wait, try that, wait, working at it all the time. And, all the time, walking, biking, lifting, eating. All the time, eating. How much I’d like to cut that last one out. How much I’d like to stop.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 6, 2019 in Culture, psychology, Suicide

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Student Perception of Speed as Affected by Diction: how charged words, as opposed to academic and neutral language, heighten emotions, create bias and skew judgement with specific emphasis on outliers

It has been a long time since I have done a study. 1988, I think. Designed one or run one. A long time since I have written one, and I know I have made many errors here.

I have been telling my students that words matter. Words create perception and they can be used to create bias, emotion, action or inaction. We study appeals to pathos, logos, ethos, kairos.  Loaded language and logical fallacies. But I often sense they do not believe me.  So I thought I would put them in the middle of their own proof.

The result was many open eyes and one student who insisted he should be filming me as a TED talk.

The results are below.

 

Design
This study is designed to see if using a “charged” term, non-academic diction, can change perception of external events. Such language can be used to create bias or emotional states and it was my desire to demonstrate this to English honors and Advance Placement English Language and Composition classes. If the hypothesis is correct, this can demonstrate how “charged” terms can be used to control the overall responses of populations.

I hypothesis that using terms with a “positive charge” will increase perception of speed in a filmed vehicular accident.

Population
Three classes of tenth grade honors English students were tested, with populations of 18, 19 and 21. All classes were studying the same curriculum and in the same program at the same location in their curriculum and instructed with the same materials, methods and instructor.

Material
Each class was shown a five second film of a vehicular accident or a motorcycle striking a car that had just pulled out of a parking spot, as filled from a helmet camera. The film showed the motorcycle increasing in speed, with the sound of the engine extant, and striking the broadside of the car. It was made obvious, in the film, the rider was not hurt appreciably hurt, and there were no signs of injury in the film.

Method
Each class was asked to estimate the speed of the collision and to write the number, in miles per hour, on a note, but each class was asked using a slightly differently worded query. The control group was asked the question in academic diction devoid of purposefully charged language.  A second group was asked the same question with a word replacement or a neutral for a word with a “positive charge.”  The third group had a query with two words carrying a “positive charge.”

  1. What was the speed of the vehicle when the accident occurred?
  2. What was the speed of the vehicle when it smashed into the other?
  3. How fast was the vehicle when it smashed into the other one?

The notes were collected and the data compiled for mean, median and mode as well as lowest and highest outliers.

 

Population 1

27 mph average speed estimate

30 median

30 mode

Lowest outlier 4 mph. Highest Outlier 53 mph.

 

Population 2

33 mph average speed estimate

30 median

30 mode

Lowest outlier 12 mph. Highest outlier 55 mph.

 

Population 3

38 mph average speed estimate

35 median

35 – 40 split for the mode, with four estimates for each

Lowest outlier 18 mph. Highest outlier was 80 mph.

Results
The language with the least emotional charge, the academic diction, resulted in the lowest perceived mean speed as well as the lowest outliers.

The language with one added “charged” word increased the mean perceived speed 22.22% 33 mph over the control group
The median and mode did not shift but the lowest and highest perceived speed increased by 200% and 3.78% respectively over the control group.

The language with two “charged” words increased the mean perceived speed by 40.74% to 38 mph over the control.
The median increased 16.67% to 35 mph and the mode was split evenly between 35 and 40 mph. Using the mean of this mode to calculate percentage, the mode increased 25% over the control. Seemingly most telling is the increase in the outliers.  The lowest perceived speed increased from 4 mph to 18 mph (350%) and 80 for the highest (50.94%) over the control group.

It is clear using charged words increased perceived speed.

This can be extrapolated to other areas, such as crowd size, levels of violence, impending danger and many other real world events.

Interpretation
This demonstrates several things. Language can be leading/loaded even if language does not appear to be. Academic diction has the lowest “charge,” and this supports the need to teach students to be write in an academic fashion. It also supports the need to instruct them to understand the importance of diction, so they can recognize language which appears to create logos when it is really designed to create pathos, thus allowing students to notice subtle manipulations in language meant to create emotional responses to skew perception and/or drive opinion. Further, it demonstrates the need for careful word choice with high semantic value to decrease linguistic indeterminacy.

Replication and Refinement
In replicating this study, I would select a population corrected for gender and academic level to assure the populations were homogeneous. Further, I would add a 4th group with a variable “negatively charged” term to see if the perception of the estimated speed in such a group would be lower than the control.

In further refinement, I would like to test to see if changing the charged adverb (fast, slowly, quickly) or the verb (smashed, collided, hit) have differing magnitudes of affect.

Discussion
We are aware that journalism can look objective but, upon examination, we find leading words and loaded language hiding in the sentences. This can have an effect on how we perceive an event. The word “mob” used for an assemblage instead of group can, and does, affect how people perceive the assemblage and this carries over to the perception of the individuals within the assemblage.

While I understand, in this test, the outliers skew the data, and it is possible the outliers should be taken into account when calculations are made, the outliers are of interest in themselves. Both ends of the outliers rose with inclusion of the charged words. The outlier at the higher end is of particular interest as it is the outliers in a society that cause the most dramatic and concentrated change and cause the most trauma as well (terrorism, murder, mass shootings) and if a small inclusion of a charged word can create a large increase in the emotional response of the top outliers, this is worth noting.

While we cannot combat this in every instance, we can begin to educate students to be aware it exists and to be on the lookout for the use of such language. Words with a positive charge can be used to excite/increase bias and bring activity when coupled with a call to action.  Words with a negative charge can dampen responses and reduce activity. We see this in political rhetoric as well as in sales, and we are seeing it increasingly in social media and fringe news sources.

It is possible that educating children to recognise and not accept the charging of language may help reduce the effect of this.

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 13, 2018 in Culture, Education, psychology, Social

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

I think I Am, Maybe

I think, maybe,
I’m made of fog,
settled overnight,
In the dark,
Seems solid
From afar, look,
Walk through it.
There is no substance.
It dissipates into
Air, the sun rises,
There is nothing there.

Do you remember fogs?

Or a ghost, maybe,
An accumulation.
An aggregate of
Used tos, weres
I remembers,
Definitions,
Suppositions,
And faint ideas.
Walk through it.
There is no substance.
It dissipates into
Nothing, the sun rises,
There is nothing there.

When no one is around,
Who notices a ghost?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 26, 2018 in Poetry, psychology, Suicide

 

Tags: , , ,

I can Hear the Angles

I can hear the angels
Sing songs only the angels
Sing songs of being
Neither here nor there
Angels and those
Close to death
Sing songs often sweetly
Sing songs below hearing
For all those
Neither here nor there
Hearing the songs of
Angels and those
Near to being angels
Sing songs I hear
Everywhere.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 20, 2017 in philosophy, Poetry, psychology, Religion

 

Tags: , , , , ,