RSS

Category Archives: Culture

Food Comes To No Good

I want to be
Diaphanous. So thin
You don’t know I’m here.
Wraithlike, drawn like the
Wire, sounding only when
Plucked, brushed,
No voice of my own.

Wispy, vaporous.
Watery.

This business of
Food in the mouth
Comes to no good.
Disgusting (I tell myself)
But there I go again.

Walk a little more.
Lift a little more.
Did you eat that?
Why? Do something
About it. Get rid of it.
You don’t want that
In you.

But you will do it
Again. And again
You will feel
The shame of consumption,
Existence. The physical needs
That keep you.

From being
Insubstantial.

The constant failure
To not be
As I am supposed to be.
As I am told to be
Thin.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on June 28, 2024 in Culture, Food, Poetry, psychology

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Interpependence

I was asked, as part of the Caring Committee, at my Unitarian Universalist Church (Unitarian Universalist Friendship Fellowship in Rockledge, Florida) to help create a service to introduce the committee and the idea of interdependence. To bring them to the idea and they were not alone, that asistance was available, and we were here to help. Needed, for a bunch of stalwart headstrong intellectials. I said yes, of course.

We planned. And planned. We even planned an exercise where toe whole congreagation formed a web with two skeins of beautiful yarn I purchased, which would then be made into art to hang in the fellowship hall.

One by one, folks dropped out. Weren’t going to be in attendance. Had an autistic meltdown. Visiting family.

I’ve experienced autistic meltdowns. But when do I get to just take two weeks to get oneself back together, to rest? While I have nothing but sympathy, really, I also wonder where the grit has gone. That may be unfair. I understand. Still,… “Ok, I got this.,” I said, the irony not being lost on me.

Let me know if you need help or want me to do a part, someone else said. No, that’s ok. I want to know that, when that Sunday comes, there are no loose ends. No suprises. No hiccups caused by someone who can’t show up for whatever reason. I was the one you wanted for a group project in school. I was not the one who ever wanted to do a group project.

I chose the readings. I chose the music. I’m in the choir as well, and chose songs that felt right for the subject, but also we’d enjoy singing. Two we could even play alonng with, opening with “Somos El Barco,” with two of us on ukuleles and our choir director picking on his guitar.

And here is the result, minus the, readings, houskeeping items, announcments, Joys and Concerns, and offertory,”You’ve Got A Friend,” and hymms, “Lean On Me,” and “The Oneness Of Everything.”

Welcome: Welcome, one and all. Whoever you are, however you are, whatever brings you here, welcome. If you have come in despair, welcome. If you have come in joy, welcome, if you have come in confusion or understanding, sadness or delight, welcome. If you have come with a hand to lend, welcome. If you have come with a hand in need, welcome. Welcome to all.

Let’s call up the children, if they would, to join us and light our chalice. The chalice is a symbol of peace and acceptance. And of safety. It is a symbol of acceptance and communion for those who are like us, and those who are unlike us. It is a symbol of light that calls to those who are in need, in want, in pain, and in danger. At one time or another, then, it calls to each of us.  

Chalice Lighting: “In the light of truth and in the warmth of love, we gather to seek, to sustain and to share.”

Opening words

Today’s service is brought to you by the letter I. I, for Interdependence. If you buy into the whole American mythos, you’d think it was only for the word Independent: The myth of rugged independence. And by the letter C. C is for Committee, which which we are replete, and C is for Caring. And, best of all, for Caring Committee. Could we have the folks in the Caring Committee stand up please. Would the chair of the committee raise their hand, please? 

What have others said about rugged independence? Joseph Campbell told us “The giant of self-achieved independence is the world’s messenger of disaster…” 

“The whole idea of compassion, Thomas Merton teaches us, is based on a keen awareness of the interdependence of all these living beings, which are all part of one another, and all involved in one another.” 

Only two weeks ago, many of us sat in the very room and listened to the nuns of Blue Cliff Monastery talk to us about what they called Interbeing. And our own seventh principle reminds us to “respect the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.”

When I was but in 8th grade, this is what I learned from Alan Watts, “We are not just a skin-encapsulated ego, a soul encased in flesh. We are each other and together we are the world.”

We often feel alone in this world. “We’re born alone, and we die alone,” We hear this, and we hear this a lot. And many of us have taken this, unfortunately, to heart.  But are we alone, really? We have an epidemic of loneliness in America. 

The surgeon general has raised alarms about this with a new study showing nearly 38 million Americans live alone and are subject to higher incidence of depression because they have no social networks. And, make no mistake, the epidemic is deadly. Not just suicide. No one who will know when our memory is failing, or to help us when we fall from a stepstool we should not have been on. No one to ask the doctor a question the patient may have been too overwrought to think of. Too overwhelmed to remember. No one to look forward to seeing, sharing time with, seeing a movie with, sharing a meal, walking alongside.

The myth of independence is forced into us with our milk. The myth of do it yourself, be your own person, no one is going to do it for you, pick yourself up by your own bootstraps. 

Alissa Quart discusses this very idea in her book Bootstrapped: Liberating Ourselves from the American Dream

Pick yourself up by your own bootstraps… was a joke. An absurdity. It’s a metaphor that refers to a task that is impossible to do. The phrase is believed to come from the German author Rudolf Erich Raspe, who wrote about a character who extracted himself from being mired in a swamp by pulling himself up by his own hair.

There was a fellow named Nimrod Murphree who, in 1834, claimed he was a fully self-made man. He also claimed to have invented perpetual motion. And he was being mocked thoroughly for saying so. “Probably Mr. Murphree has succeeded in handing himself over the Cumberland river, or a barnyard fence, by the straps of his boots,” wrote a newspaper column of the day. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the phrase was used to describe an impossible task. In the Racine Advocate, some ten years later, they said the governor must be trying to pull himself up by the bootstraps. Again, making fun of him, because you can’t really pull yourself up by your bootstraps. 

It was even used as sort of metaphysical joke with a psychologist in the 1860s writing that the attempt of the mind to analyze itself is analogous to the one who would lift himself up by his own bootstraps.

But today, we use the term to suggest that someone should handle their own problems, fix themselves, by themselves, for themselves.

Do it on your own, be that self-made person who handed themselves over the Cumberland with his perpetual motion machine. It has, unfortunately, ceased being a joke. 

Orson Wells reiterated “We’re born alone, we live alone, we die alone.” But he added, “Only through our love and friendship can we create the illusion for the moment that we’re not alone.” But Wells got it wrong. It is independence that is the illusion. No. one. goes. it. alone. No one can lift themselves up 

by their hair. No one. Not. one. of. us. 

Instead, we are the quaking aspen, which appear as individual trees, but are really one, joined by the roots. We are mushrooms, which pop up here and there, some solitary, some in groups, but all joined by the great mycelium network. None of us are alone. We do not come into this life, we come from life itself and are always part of life. We come from the earth and go back to it. As the apple tree apples, the earth peoples. Ant the earth, too, part of the whole. We are all in this together.

And that is what we are here for today. We are all, every thing, part of Indira’s net, which extends out infinitely, in all directions, all things a part of the net, all stones, all trees, apples, people, all beings. All that we believe is alive. All that we believe is not alive. Not one of us moves that it does not, in some way, affect all who live in the net. And, at each joint in the net, a glittering jewel which reflects the light from all the others. Your face, my face, the faces of those you love, and those you do not love. We are recursive images of all existence. We breathe in and out each other’s lives and we are built of those who came before us and what we leave will build those who come after. We are infinity.

How do we carry this into our everyday lives? How do we carry this into our congregation? Ask Thoreau, ask Emerson, ask Whitman. 

Ask the physicist, the botanist, the biologist. Ask the Buddhist. Hindu, shaman, witch. 

First, Interdependence poses a challenge to the idea of one-sided individualism, the belief that the individual is of primary importance and invites us to see that the whole, the community, our congregation, as equally important as the individual. Because the whole is contained within each of us. Because of compassion. And because it makes sense. “Logic clearly dictates the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” Spock said that to Kirk in The Wrath of Kahn, as he sacrificed himself for his crew. Yes, I managed to quote Star Trek. To be fair, of course, it was Gene Roddenberry who wrote that, but that leaves it making no less sense.

And, as we are a part of the whole, interdependence is balance. Our own needs taken into account as we serve our greater community. 

Resting when we need, so we can keep going, so we can be there for others, in times of joy and in times of need. As a part of the whole, it is important we keep ourselves well, so we may help the whole survive and thrive. 

Interdependence allows us to see that we are not separate entities! Our well-being is mutual. Our present and future is shared. We truly are all in this together. 

And what do we gain by this? Greater compassion, yes. The feelings of awe, wonder, and profound gratitude, yes. But we also can enjoy a deeper sense of meaning and understanding. And it makes it easier to give. Easier to receive. Though many of us have quite a hard time receiving.

But those who receive also give. There is a gift in need, giving others the opportunity for service. Many long for an opportunity to be of service to others, but do not know what to do. Your need may, paradoxically, be a gift to others. 

Never underestimate the power of service, the interdependent nature of community, and the gifts that it can bring to that community. The growth, binding, strengthening it gives us the opportunity for. Ask. Ask for what you need. Your desire to self-reliance at all costs may be robbing others of chances to grow. Ask. Ask, and do not deny others the chance to help. Do not deny others the chance to help. 

Ask for assistance. Tell us your needs. It doesn’t mean you don’t know what you are doing. It doesn’t make you less. And, despite how you may feel, it doesn’t make you a fraud as an adult.  Amanda Palmer, in her book The Art of Asking, assures us  “The Fraud Police are the imaginary, terrifying force (for many) ‘real’ grown-ups believe – at some subconscious level – will use asking for help as real evidence that they have failed as a grown-up. But nothing could be further from the truth.” Asking means you know what your powers are, and are not. So, when in need, stand up and say, “I need help.”  Ask. 

And when we ask for help with gratitude to our community, it gives the community the opportunity to give with gratitude.  Do not deny that of others. 

Years ago, In my late 40’s, I was in need. I assure you it was not the first time. 

But it was the first time in my life I was alone. Or thought I was. The first time I faced an empty house IN MY ENTIRE LIFE. I ceased to function. Apart from letting out my dog, I barely moved. I needed help, but didn’t even know what to ask for. I barely spoke. A friend told me though, that she saw what the need was, and acted. And help came. Some I needed, some I didn’t quite, as I could not say WHAT I needed at that time, but even the “unneeded” giving gave me something I DID need -the knowledge that people loved me. People I didn’t even know. That love, from friends, from strangers, that service, kept me here, kept me from being destroyed. And kept me from destroying myself. 

Some two months later I cooked a meal for myself. I hadn’t done so in many months, though I certainly knew how. And I shared it with a friend, telling her I had no idea what my life would look like now, but was going to return to volunteering. Why, she asked? I said, without thinking, that when we don’t know how to help ourselves, the best thing we can do is help other people. If we all did that, no one would be in need. I rarely listen to my own advice, this this, I have stuck with and it has often gotten me through. When I do not know what to do for yourself, help somebody else. 

I think back now: What would not have gotten done if I had not been open to receiving help. Who would I not be here for now? Who would not be receiving now. Who can I help because I was given the help I needed when it was most desperate. Because people listened when I could not even speak. Because we are all in this together. 

This is the mutuality of real community. Meaning and purpose follow in its wake. The magic of interdependence. 

Never second guess yourself. We do not know what act of service will bear the most fruit, the sweetest, or most meaningful. It could be small, it could be large, but we do not know how large it may grow, or the beauty it may grow into. Do not wonder later if you could have helped. Do it. Service in itself is beautiful, no matter the size. It is never not good enough, never too small. The Buddhist author, monk and psychologist Jack Kornfield tells us to never say no to an impulse to service. 

We too often think them too small, or of too little consequence, or what we have to give is too little, but it is never the case. It is the nature of interdependence that all actions matter, reflect in all the glory that is our world, ripple and grow. 

Many of us here have gone without, done without, have been in need, and have been quiet. Many here have had a hand to offer, but none to take it. Many have needed a hand, but have never let anyone know. Pride, arrogance, the desire to “pull ourselves up by our own bootstraps,” perhaps. Or, maybe, we have swallowed the American myth of individual worth coming only from individual effort. From only the value of what we have produced.

What I ask you, today, is that you remember, we are here for each other, to serve, delight in, help, and protect, befriend, feed, listen to, and walk along with when our paths converge, wherever those paths lead. To speak up when you are in need, say something, write a note. To stand up when you know there IS a need, a challenge, a misfortune – yours, someone else’s, that we, as a congregation can address, assist with, diminish. 

We can share each other’s joys, and we can relieve each other’s sufferings. But only if we speak. Only if we know. 

And only if we stop seeing ourselves as a collection of individuals and, instead, as the connected, loving community we are. This, if anything, is the covenant we should pledge. 

Extinguish the Chalice

The Chalice is now extinguished, but may its light live on in the minds and hearts and souls of each of us. May you carry that flame with you as you leave this place and share it with those you know, with those you love, and most especially, with those you have yet to meet. So may it be.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 19, 2024 in Culture, Religion, Social

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Public schools aren’t for just children or parents, but for society as a whole | Opinion

This was published today in Florida Today. I’ll leave it to speak for itself.

Tenth grade honors English class. Students were working on a short writing exercise. The stimulus? A quote by Alfred Adler, the famed psychologist and personality theorist who postulated humans are driven by the will to power. The desire to affect their world. “Meanings are not determined by situations, but we determine ourselves by the meanings we give to situations.” We have already read similarly in Shakespeare and in “Man’s Search for Meaning” by Holocaust survivor, psychiatrist and developer of Logotherapy, Viktor Frankl.

Then, one student raised his hand and asked the purpose of public schools. We all make different connections with material, so questions that seem unconnected really aren’t. I asked them for their ideas.

“So we can get jobs.”

No.

“So we can have better lives.”

Nope.

“So our parents can go to work.”

I can’t disagree, but let’s look at original purposes. Exigence.

“So we can be happy.”

Nah.

“To make the world better.”

Nope.

I asked, why is it that folks without kids still pay for schools for you guys? Why did Jefferson want free education?

Silence.

Adam Byrn Tritt: “The sole purpose of our public schools, as described by Jefferson himself, a proponent of free education, is to create an educated electorate able to discern the factual from the fallacious, to think critically regarding the world and information at hand, to synthesize that information and be able to communicate that clearly in their writings, decisions, and, most importantly, at the ballot box.”

Why is it that curriculum isn’t up to parents? Why are school boards not elected by just parents? Because schools aren’t for their benefit. They aren’t for your benefit, either. They are for the collective benefit. Collective. The benefit of our society as a whole, not the individual. The purpose of public education is to ensure the citizens, the voters, have the ability to look critically at facts, and tell fact from fiction, fact from opinion. So voters can make smart decisions based on facts and then become smart officials, and officeholders who make decisions based on what’s best for the country and its people. So we can continue to have a real representative democracy. And pulled out this, from Thomas Jefferson:

“That democracy cannot long exist without enlightenment; That it cannot function without wise and honest officials; That talent and virtue, needed in a free society, should be educated regardless of wealth, birth or other accidental condition; That other children of the poor must thus be educated at common expense.”

The sole purpose of our public schools, as described by Jefferson himself, a proponent of free education, is to create an educated electorate able to discern the factual from the fallacious, to think critically regarding the world and information at hand, to synthesize that information and be able to communicate that clearly in their writings, decisions, and, most importantly, at the ballot box.

Eva Brann, writing for the journal “The Imaginative Conservative,” went so far as to point out that Jefferson was Hegelian in his thought, looking for citizens to be able to take a thesis and a diathesis and be able to synthesize them into useful information and, then, into practical decisions. To make choices and take actions not simply for the individual good, what is best for the one, but what is best for our country and our democracy.

This philosophic, logical attitude should not be surprising. Jefferson was a natural philosopher and inventor. The Founding Fathers were highly educated and concentrated in the seven liberal arts: grammar, logic, and rhetoric (called the trivium), as well as arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music (the quadrivium). They were well-versed in philosophy and logic, and we know, certainly, this is true of Jefferson. It is this logic, and the purpose of that logic, at the foundation of public education.

Recall Benjamin Franklin and his feelings on our democracy. After the Constitutional Convention in 1787, he was asked, by Ms. Elizabeth Powell, “Doctor, what have we got? A republic or a monarchy?” Franklin answered, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

This is the often-used portion of the interaction, but Franklin is often not often quoted in full, as his outlook tended towards the ominous. Powell asked, immediately, “And why not keep it?” Franklin responded: “Because the people, on tasting the dish, are always disposed to eat more of it than does them good.” Power. Franklin knew once tasting power, those in charge, appointed, elected, in government of business, would want more.

The only bulwark we have against such growing power, such rampant avarice, against the good of our cherished democracy, to keep it in the hands of the people, is the ballot box.

A thriving, healthy democracy requires an electorate which can look critically at information, see the world and problems we face logically, and decide which actions are best for the good of our nation, not for individual comfort or personal pocketbooks. Jefferson believed in the power of that education and, that a citizenry educated so, would make decisions in the best interest of our nation and the common good. This is the spirit in which curriculum should be created and lessons planned. The desired outcome is nothing less than a healthy democracy.

Thus, our public schools are not for the children. They are not for the parents. They are for the country and our democracy. A curriculum, based on literacy, numeracy, critical thinking, and rhetorical skill is necessary for the protection of our republic. If such a curriculum is not to the liking of a parent, there are private schools. If a parent does not like the secular nature of public education, there are religious schools. If there is a book a parent wishes a child not read, they may forbid their child to read it. But they must understand the public school is not made for the good of the individual student, and the parent is not the “customer.”

The customer is our nation. Our democratic republic. If we can keep it.

Adam Byrn Tritt teaches Honors and AP English for Brevard Public Schools and is Brevard Soil and Water Conservation District supervisor, Group 1.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 8, 2022 in Culture, Education

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

What’s In A Name?

What’s in a name? For a rose, very little. Roses don’t care. But people. People care, and why would they not? Identity, history, connection, and potential futures can come and go with a mis-identification, mis-recognition,or mis-spoken name. Names have power. Names have weight.

But old patterns die hard. They weigh more. Life changes, but old patterns don’t. The brain changes but the patterns are still recognised. Still followed. They are the watercourse.

Know a girl since you are fifteen, marry, have children, grow older, support each other, change with each other, be happy, develop patterns of speech, strings of words, ways of communicating, watch her die. Old patterns – they don’t die. 

Life is relentless. Keep promises. Be happy. Grow. Change. Love again. Love well. Love fully and completely. Be happy together. And, always, yet, the danger of the old pattern. The name. The slight halt before the saying. The self-check. The nearly unconscious pattern of words as it nearly slips out. Nearly, corrected. Not always. Not even often. But sometimes. And sometimes, even seldom, is enough to give wary pause always.

Don’t make the mistake, though, sometimes the name is half-out before you catch it. Don’t make the mistake, though sometimes you know you must have.  Hope you have not, but know you have. No one deserves that. 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 21, 2021 in Culture, Family, psychology

 

Tags: , , , , ,

George Floyd Square

Cup Foods is vibrant with activity. Deli counter, racks stacked with locally-made foods, locally grown produce on open shelves. Parents walk in with their children, picking summer treats.  At tables, men sit and talk about George in a way that says “We knew him. We knew him well.”  That says he is still here. It is a multi-hued humanity in a neighbourhood hub.

This is 38th Street and Chicago, George Floyd Square, Brooklyn Center, Minneapolis. To get into Cup Foods, one could avoid the spot where George Floyd was murdered. I do not. I stand there. I wonder. What would it be like to have my own neck knelt on for nearly nine minutes, to slowly lose consciousness, to suffocate. I stand there, and I do not stand there alone.

Taken over by the neighbourhood, then cleared by the city, then met with compromise by both, traffic is reduced to one lane each way, and slow, with bright, meaningfully decorated concrete barricades, here on one side of the street, then on the other, with wide crosswalks and gaps for pedestrians, George Floyd Square is alive. A community garden feeds this diverse neighbourhood of Edwardian and Victorian homes and busy sidewalks. Murals adorn the walls of the businesses on the corners. There is Martin Luther King. There is Malcolm X. There is John Lewis. There is George Floyd.


The traffic circle, amid flowering plants, holds signs with the names and faces of the slain. I walk around it, clockwise, slowly, pronounce each name. There is Breonna Taylor. There is Trayvon Martin. There is Emmett Till. Name after name, recognised and not. The famous by deed and those brought to fame by moments of senseless violence and inhumanity. Of one person feeling they had the right to wield power over another. Of those sworn to protect and serve becoming agents of death.

Here is a place to pray. Here is a place to sit. Here is a makeshift memorial library large enough for two or three people to step into. Bring books, take books. It is fully stocked, shelves floor to ceiling. Awash in colour. We select one for our grandaughter, Sadie. Granny Torrelli Makes Soup by Sharon Creech and note, inside the cover, where it came from with an enclosed photograph. The convenience store across from Cup Foods is covered in writings of social justice, ground to roof, and, again, colour. Color everywhere. Candles, flowers, pictures, notes, everywhere, on everything. And, everywhere, people. People talking, walking, writing, in contemplation, meditation, prayer.

We stand together. Look around. A living memorial in a living neighbourhood. A statement of grief and tenacity, sadness and resilience. Lisa cries. A tall woman walks over, dark brown skin, bright yellow shirt. Hugs her. Is it right that those who live this console those who only witness? Yes. Yes, she says. We are all in this together. We are all one, together..

Across the street she points. A young white woman. ”She has been here every day for a year. I’m here most days, making sure people are safe and understand it is still a working street. We want to keep everybody safe.”

Walk down the street, two blocks, she tells us. To the cemetery. Past the community garden that begins with a picture of John Lewis admonishing us to make “Good Trouble” and ends with squash, tomatoes, cucumbers and herbs. The whole way, homes with pride flags, Black Lives matter signs, and reminders that science is real, and love is love.

Turn left. One block down the hill to the field. To our right, an apartment building. To the left, old three story homes. At the end of the street, a large pond and central fountain to the right, houses to the left, a green concave field with rows of small tombstones. Over one hundred of them, each with a name, dates, location, and “rest in power.”  Behind the field, a grassy slope up to a busy street, and, amid the green, the words, in white, “SAY THEIR NAMES. 

A small table is front and center. A person hands out information. A Lokotah man greets us. We talk.

When did all this start, I ask him.

“With Columbus, man. With Columbus.” 

We walk the seven long rows, saying each name. Shot by police in her bed. Shot by police in front of a store. Shot by police in his home. Shot by police in front of his mother. Shot by police in front of his children. A massage therapist. A violin student. An autistic student. A prisoner. Nearly every one a person of colour. And those who weren’t, autistic.

No one is a saint. But everyone is a sinner. No one deserved this.

We walk. Name. Name. Name. Name. But each one is said.

A donation is left, and we walk up the hill, down the street, through the square. There is a place to be, and we must go. In the car, we sit quietly for a few moments. There are butter cookies. We squeeze each other’s hand. 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 28, 2021 in Culture, Social

 

Tags: , , , ,

Shudder Reflex

I’m trying to write 
a poem about a man who
died with a hood on his head,
naked, on the street,
pleading for his life,
murdered while the cameras rolled,
at the hands of those
who are supposed to protect him— 
a public snuff film.

I’m sorry, I don’t remember his name.
There have been so many.

My shudder reflex is still active.
I can’t watch this, but
I watch regardless—
in some small way so he 
would not die without witness,
after witness, after witness, after….

How do I write about this? 
What can I say as poignant
as his own begging? 
What can I say as meaningful
as the tears of his own family?

Seriously, 
what am I supposed to do?

If he were my son,
I’d want the world to burn too.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 6, 2020 in Culture, Poetry, Social

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Empty Chairs

It is coming on to Passover. A month ago I invited people over to share seder with us. The first time in ten years. More years. The first time I have celebrated passover since Lee died. The first time I have written died instead of left. The anniversary of my first year in my new house.

I asked Lisa if she wanted to have Passover in our new home. She said yes. She was excited. That was all I needed.

We used to have a house full of people. In the haggadah, the book that has the order of the seder, the Passover celebratory supper, it says we recline on this night. It is one of the four questions asked by the youngest child. Mah nishtanah, ha-laylah ha-zeh,mi-kol ha-leylot. Why is tonight different from all other nights? Why do we recline tonight when all other nights we sit straight? We recline to represent our freedom, the freedom from bondage. In our house there was no choice but to recline. Forty-two people in one very small house left us sitting, reclining, leaning and otherwise enjoying the story of Passover on the floor, leaning against the sofa, on the sofa, at makeshift tables, draped over each other, waiting for the Angel of Death to pass us over..

Each year we did this, and people would come. Students who could not get home would hear about it through Hillel, the Jewish student group, at UF. From Santa Fe Community College. Neighbours. Friends.Jews, Christians, Pagans, Buddhists. Everyone brings something. We tell the story of Spring, of rebirth and renewal, because passover is, at the root, a Spring holy-day. We tell of release from bondage, real and metaphoric, and how those who have been slaves but are now free must then reach down to others, extend a hand, to help lift them to freedom. How those who have been freed must never enslave another. A holy-day of social action, equality, and freedom.

I’d even take red streamer paper and cover the outside doorposts and lentice-piece, as the old story says they were painted with the blood of the sacrificed lamb, to tell the Angel of Death to pass over our home. There would be no death here tonight.

Some days earlier we had met Joyce. And she was invited. Her first time in our home for the woman with whom we had become instant fast-friends, and not even a place to sit. There would be no death here tonight.

Sef and I baked matzah, the unleavened bread, the bread of haste, and prepared the house. The seder plate was set. People arrived. We told stories, sang songs, ate bitter herbs, broke matzah, tasted salt water, enjoyed charoset, tolerated horseradish on, and those of use who did not like it, made fun of those of us who enjoyed the gefilte fish. We hid the afikomen (a small piece of matzah) for the children to find, for there were many children there, including our own, and we left a cup of wine for Elijah, in case he should arrive at our door. For Elijah, and all those who are missing, being missed, absent. Metaphoric. Abstract.
This year we have invited people. Most have not responded. One person said she understood this was an honor, and, with appreciation, told me she would be away. Others just said they’d see. They don’t understand – it isn’t game-night. It isn’t just a friendly invitation to come over for a drink. It’s Passover. It’s a different world, it feels like. I don’t know how they don’t get it. But, also, I don’t know how to explain it and have no real desire to.

I know the right people will be there. Lisa. Arlene. Family. That is family. They are family. The nextdoor neighbours will be there. The children are far away. Anyone else, it seems not. There will be no need to recline this Passover.

But there are people who would be there. And for them, the empty places are no longer metaphor. No longer abstract, but painfully, concretely, empty.

Joyce will not be there. She is dying. Close to death. Close enough that she has been visited by Lee, who sits with her. Two empty chairs.

The Angel of Death is a myth. Or, if not, certainly being able to protect loved ones from its grasp is most certainly. Nothing painted over the door will work. No feng shui mirror will reflect it. No prayers will avert it. Death comes.

This Passover, as we are celebrating freedom, I’ll be noticing the empty chairs. And I’ll be thinking, while we are alive, do something with that freedom. We must. Because nothing will protect us. Nothing will stop death. Old age is never guaranteed, only death, at any time.

This is what I’ll be telling myself so I can, the best I can, turn the empty chairs into something more meaningful than symbols of loss, vacuity, grief. Because I suspect there will be many more empty chairs for me to get used to. More cups of wine to pour that will not be sipped. More memories to step around, to not become lost in, as I open my eyes for each coming dawn, go about my days, close my eyes in the dark nights.

Or maybe I’ll be an empty chair, a cup of wine, a quiet moment.

This Passover I will not be covering the doorposts. There is no need. The Angel doesn’t care. Come or go, we’ll celebrate. With life and death, we’ll celebrate. With love, we’ll celebrate, while we can. And lift our glasses to each and every empty chair and know there is one thing the Angel of Death cannot kill.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 10, 2019 in Culture, Family, philosophy, Religion

 

Tags: , , , ,

Food

Food is a pain in the ass. I understand it isn’t supposed to be, but it is. And I understand how ungrateful I sound saying so. Food is necessary, I know, but I like to think it isn’t. That it doesn’t need to be.

I think I hate food, actually. I’d say I hate food except when I’m eating it, but that isn’t true. I hate food even when I’m eating it. I hate food even when I’m enjoying it. I know that enjoyment is thoroughly transitory and, unless my food it is perfectly chosen and portioned, it will be followed by regret, guilt, rapprochement, and replays of all choices I could have made better, with each imperfect choice a failure of my character.

I’d happily eat a “chow” instead, or food pills, and be done with it. The chow could come in cans, like dog food. Not that horrendous stuff but something like Merrick’s. Merricks has flavours like Granny’s Pot Pie, Cowboy Cookout, Brats and Tots. We used to feed Dusty Merrick’s and, once, when my son opened a can for her, he looked at his mother and asked, “Why don’t you ever cook anything this good.” She had no answer. Mostly because he was right. And there was everything Dusty needed there, made with the best of ingredients, in just two cans a day. Why can’t I have that? Why can’t I have that simplicity and security?

I’ve tried shakes and such but the results are less than positive after a few days. Troublesome. Uncomfortable. I’ve gone as much as a week, and didn’t get out much, other than to work, after day three. I’ve also tried simply not eating. Eight days is as far as I ever got. Just didn’t want to eat. Eight days and I finally relented. People began to notice. Not in my face or clothes, but just noted they hadn’t ever seen me eat or refer to any meals. This is what happens when people love you. They notice things. Sometimes I think that is a good reason to be alone.

I had actually planned on going much longer, and in my head didn’t think anyone would notice at all. That I could go a month and no one would notice. That was my plan. A month. Longer.

Planning, choosing. Worrying. Food is never simple. So much of it is obviously crap, and I don’t want to eat that. And there are so many diets to choose from. Even when one dismisses the idea of a diet as specifically for weight-loss, the number of ideas of how a person should eat are staggering and contradictory. How to choose? They all can’t be right.

Michael Pollan says we worry about diets far too much. “Eat (real) food. Not too much. Mostly vegetables.”And “If it came from a plant, eat it. If it is made in a plant, don’t.”  Those are his rules. They should be easy to follow, but planning any meal shows they are not. This is why I tend to just eat the same thing again and again, even though I am a more than adequate and inventive cook who can plan rather nice meals for friends and family when occasions calls for them. For other people, yes. For myself, I’m happy to do the same thing for each meal, without getting bored, just for the sake of simplicity and to remove the tyranny of choice.

Mornings, if I can just put stuff in a blender and know it’s good for me, I honestly don’t care what it tastes like. Greens, protein/eggs, a nut milk (no dairy unless I want to spend the day with a headache and stuffed sinuses). Done. I can add cocoa powder and stevia. That’s fine. But I don’t have to. No having to make choices, plan, choose, “what do I feel like,” etc…

My mother worked her whole life to lose weight. We are a thick people. Cabbage diets. Liquid protein. Carb free. As long as I can remember, she was dieting. I can’t recall it ever working. She finally lost her extra weight, twelve years into her fifteen years with parkinson’s. She was an exquisitely thin corpse.

I went carb-free, or nearly so, at twelve or thirteen. No more than forty grams of carbohydrates a day. I counted. I don’t remember how much I weighed or how much I lost, but I recall I thought I was still horribly fat. My clothes could not be tight. Nothing could cling. It had to be loose or I would pull at it, stretch it, tug it away, misshape it. I could not stand the feel of it and always blamed it not on the clothes being too small, not on skin sensitivity, but on one thing – I’m, obviously, too fat.

I was 140 pounds. When I see pictures of myself then, I’m astonished how thin I was. What was I complaining about? What could I not have liked about my body? But, then, the answer to that question was “everything.” There was everything not to like, and nothing to appreciate.

Even then, I could not look in a mirror. I pass mirrors and close my eyes. My wife once noticed, when I shave, I lean into the mirror, but close my eyes. Nothing to see here.

Once, a few years ago, a decade, less, I passed a mirror and saw someone I didn’t recognise and thought, since it was a small office, and my office at that, “Nice/Who is that?/Cute” all at once. I remember this so well, and the pile of thought, because within that same moment I realised it was me, and I saw the image shifted into one I could not stand. I could not recapture that moment, that feeling. I can remember it, but can’t feel it. And delusion does not succumb to logic.

In the mid 2000’s, I was in Weight Watchers. I had to lie to get into it. They asked me if I binged or starved. I lied. I binged and purged. Since I was a teen. Certain foods were hooks. Peanut butter. A jar would not last. A bag of potato chips would not make the night unless I froze it. Then it might make a few nights. A tray or box of fried chicken? Gone. Sometimes I’d buy a tub of frosting and eat the whole thing while watching TV. That would make me tremendously sick. I’d tell myself I’d never do it again. Why would I? Then I’d convince myself, a month later, or on a special occasion, that it was ok. I’d rationalise it. I could rationalise anything. That was especially true if it was at night. Nights are dangerous. Every purchase a personal failure.

The best way to handle this was to simply not buy these things. They didn’t come into the house. I finally did manage to learn to do that. But I might get a cookie. Or a roll. Then I’d punish myself by having to run a mile for that cookie. Eat a cookie? Now you need to run. When I couldn’t do that, laxatives. Then, realising that was easier, I’d take laxatives anytime I considered what I did binging – a piece of cake or slice of pie, too much at a potluck. My definition of binging is very liberal.

I hate food-centered events and try to not participate. At work, I stay in my room anytime there will be food involved. I “feel” people are watching what I’m eating, judging. It’s easier to just stay away. Required to attend? I go early, race to get there first, so i can choose an empty table, sit far away, as long as i can sit alone. “There are donuts in the teacher workroom.” That day, I don’t even check my mailbox.

With Weight Watchers, I lost weight. I never got to goal weight though. I did get down to 152. Their charts said I should be 118 to 128. My wife said that would be a ridiculous weight for me – far too thin for my body-type. She, being a doctor, could certify, and did, that my goal was 142. It might as well have been 118, as it was just as unreachable. Food log, pedometer, a scale for me and one for the food, measuring cups, a well-used gym membership. 152. I must have recognised I had done well. I even wrote about the hard work of losing weight, and the success of it. But I still hated seeing myself. The failure of it. Now I look at that and wonder, what was I complaining about? But that’s gone too.

When she died, my weight was 202. A few months later, after I began to look at the world again, I got a membership at a gym that was open 24 hours. I was there when I couldn’t sleep. I was there when I was bored. I was there when I could not stand being in the house, or going home, or going to bed. So I was there nearly as much as I was home. I was there at ten at night. I was there at four in the morning. I was there twice a day sometimes. Work, gym. Work, gym. Presidential debate? Watch it on the treadmill. Show I want to see? Watch it on the treadmill. Lift weights, lift some more. I tore my right deltoid. Keep going. Eating nothing but chicken breasts and vegetables. Keep going.

I got down to 158. I thought it was terrible. When I see those pictures now… What was I thinking? I couldn’t have been thinking. It isn’t possible.

I’m back at the gym. Walking with my fitness watch. Biking. Watching what I eat. Eating. How I wish I could stop that. I gained weight last week. Despite everything. Still gaining. An obvious failure of my character.

I’m told “do this.” Do this, Do that. Try this other thing. Thyroid. Took stuff. No effect. Testosterone. Sorry, in the normal range, even though it’s at the bottom of it (like we are machine that run to the same tolerances and configurations) so none for you. Try this, wait, try that, wait, working at it all the time. And, all the time, walking, biking, lifting, eating. All the time, eating. How much I’d like to cut that last one out. How much I’d like to stop.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 6, 2019 in Culture, psychology, Suicide

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

The names of the dead were hushed at Kings Buffet.

It is one year since the shootings at Marjory Stoneman Douglas Highschool in South Florida. While we wish it could have been the last, already, there have been others.

The students, the citizens, of March for our Lives have been criticized for eclipsing the names of the people who died, but, as David Hogg said, while he understands that, they are working to make sure there comes a time when there are no more people who die this way, so their deaths will not have been for nothing. They are working tirelessly to make sure sure this becomes a reality.

In the meantime, so many. So many I can’t recall them all. Columbine was not the first. Virginia Tech. Sandy Hook. Marjory Stoneman Douglas. And the next one.

The names of the dead were hushed at Kings Buffet.

From the single TV,
High in the corner
Above the frozen soft-serve machine,
The steam table full of sesame chicken,
Broccoli and tofu,
Happy family,
On the screen
A man in a suit behind
A lectern answers questions
And announces
Now,
He will read the names of the dead.

Above the clinking plates he
Solemnly, slowly reads through
The taps of forks
The first name
Slips his lips
And, then, the music swells
From harp, guquin, violin and flute
But it was just that someone
Turned up the volume
From the wall-speakers above the salad bar
So the names continue to drop
To the sound of Mandarin and music
So the names continue to fall
To the sound of the ice and soda machine
And I can not hear them,
Didn’t know them,
Will not even know their names.

There seems little to do.
Eat my fish and think,
How I am, here, now.

In the last classroom
Twenty-one students were saved by their professor
Who used his body to bar the door
Before the shooter shot him through.
A holocaust survivor,
He had died before and for less.
It is good to know why you lived.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 13, 2019 in Culture, Poetry, Social

 

Tags: , , ,

Student Perception of Speed as Affected by Diction: how charged words, as opposed to academic and neutral language, heighten emotions, create bias and skew judgement with specific emphasis on outliers

It has been a long time since I have done a study. 1988, I think. Designed one or run one. A long time since I have written one, and I know I have made many errors here.

I have been telling my students that words matter. Words create perception and they can be used to create bias, emotion, action or inaction. We study appeals to pathos, logos, ethos, kairos.  Loaded language and logical fallacies. But I often sense they do not believe me.  So I thought I would put them in the middle of their own proof.

The result was many open eyes and one student who insisted he should be filming me as a TED talk.

The results are below.

 

Design
This study is designed to see if using a “charged” term, non-academic diction, can change perception of external events. Such language can be used to create bias or emotional states and it was my desire to demonstrate this to English honors and Advance Placement English Language and Composition classes. If the hypothesis is correct, this can demonstrate how “charged” terms can be used to control the overall responses of populations.

I hypothesis that using terms with a “positive charge” will increase perception of speed in a filmed vehicular accident.

Population
Three classes of tenth grade honors English students were tested, with populations of 18, 19 and 21. All classes were studying the same curriculum and in the same program at the same location in their curriculum and instructed with the same materials, methods and instructor.

Material
Each class was shown a five second film of a vehicular accident or a motorcycle striking a car that had just pulled out of a parking spot, as filled from a helmet camera. The film showed the motorcycle increasing in speed, with the sound of the engine extant, and striking the broadside of the car. It was made obvious, in the film, the rider was not hurt appreciably hurt, and there were no signs of injury in the film.

Method
Each class was asked to estimate the speed of the collision and to write the number, in miles per hour, on a note, but each class was asked using a slightly differently worded query. The control group was asked the question in academic diction devoid of purposefully charged language.  A second group was asked the same question with a word replacement or a neutral for a word with a “positive charge.”  The third group had a query with two words carrying a “positive charge.”

  1. What was the speed of the vehicle when the accident occurred?
  2. What was the speed of the vehicle when it smashed into the other?
  3. How fast was the vehicle when it smashed into the other one?

The notes were collected and the data compiled for mean, median and mode as well as lowest and highest outliers.

 

Population 1

27 mph average speed estimate

30 median

30 mode

Lowest outlier 4 mph. Highest Outlier 53 mph.

 

Population 2

33 mph average speed estimate

30 median

30 mode

Lowest outlier 12 mph. Highest outlier 55 mph.

 

Population 3

38 mph average speed estimate

35 median

35 – 40 split for the mode, with four estimates for each

Lowest outlier 18 mph. Highest outlier was 80 mph.

Results
The language with the least emotional charge, the academic diction, resulted in the lowest perceived mean speed as well as the lowest outliers.

The language with one added “charged” word increased the mean perceived speed 22.22% 33 mph over the control group
The median and mode did not shift but the lowest and highest perceived speed increased by 200% and 3.78% respectively over the control group.

The language with two “charged” words increased the mean perceived speed by 40.74% to 38 mph over the control.
The median increased 16.67% to 35 mph and the mode was split evenly between 35 and 40 mph. Using the mean of this mode to calculate percentage, the mode increased 25% over the control. Seemingly most telling is the increase in the outliers.  The lowest perceived speed increased from 4 mph to 18 mph (350%) and 80 for the highest (50.94%) over the control group.

It is clear using charged words increased perceived speed.

This can be extrapolated to other areas, such as crowd size, levels of violence, impending danger and many other real world events.

Interpretation
This demonstrates several things. Language can be leading/loaded even if language does not appear to be. Academic diction has the lowest “charge,” and this supports the need to teach students to be write in an academic fashion. It also supports the need to instruct them to understand the importance of diction, so they can recognize language which appears to create logos when it is really designed to create pathos, thus allowing students to notice subtle manipulations in language meant to create emotional responses to skew perception and/or drive opinion. Further, it demonstrates the need for careful word choice with high semantic value to decrease linguistic indeterminacy.

Replication and Refinement
In replicating this study, I would select a population corrected for gender and academic level to assure the populations were homogeneous. Further, I would add a 4th group with a variable “negatively charged” term to see if the perception of the estimated speed in such a group would be lower than the control.

In further refinement, I would like to test to see if changing the charged adverb (fast, slowly, quickly) or the verb (smashed, collided, hit) have differing magnitudes of affect.

Discussion
We are aware that journalism can look objective but, upon examination, we find leading words and loaded language hiding in the sentences. This can have an effect on how we perceive an event. The word “mob” used for an assemblage instead of group can, and does, affect how people perceive the assemblage and this carries over to the perception of the individuals within the assemblage.

While I understand, in this test, the outliers skew the data, and it is possible the outliers should be taken into account when calculations are made, the outliers are of interest in themselves. Both ends of the outliers rose with inclusion of the charged words. The outlier at the higher end is of particular interest as it is the outliers in a society that cause the most dramatic and concentrated change and cause the most trauma as well (terrorism, murder, mass shootings) and if a small inclusion of a charged word can create a large increase in the emotional response of the top outliers, this is worth noting.

While we cannot combat this in every instance, we can begin to educate students to be aware it exists and to be on the lookout for the use of such language. Words with a positive charge can be used to excite/increase bias and bring activity when coupled with a call to action.  Words with a negative charge can dampen responses and reduce activity. We see this in political rhetoric as well as in sales, and we are seeing it increasingly in social media and fringe news sources.

It is possible that educating children to recognise and not accept the charging of language may help reduce the effect of this.

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 13, 2018 in Culture, Education, psychology, Social

 

Tags: , , , , , ,